Company Overview
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (NYSE: CNS) is a global investment manager specializing in real assets and alternative income – notably listed and private real estate, infrastructure, preferred securities, resource equities, commodities, and related strategies ([1]). Founded in 1986 and listed in 2004, the firm has grown into a niche asset-management player focused on income-oriented equity portfolios, particularly REITs and utilities ([2]). Cohen & Steers’ business model centers on managing assets for institutional and retail investors through mutual funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts, earning fees based on assets under management (AUM).
Market Context: The company’s fortunes are tied to trends in real-asset markets and investor sentiment. Broader market events – for example, a biotech breakthrough presentation like one recently delivered by Zevra Therapeutics (spotlighting a potential game-changer in the CNS disorder arena) – can influence risk appetites across sectors. However, Cohen & Steers’ performance is primarily driven by real estate and infrastructure cycles rather than biotech developments. In late 2024, many of its asset classes saw a major rebound after a difficult stretch: management noted double-digit returns in listed infrastructure and real estate, marking “a turnaround after 2.5 years of challenging market conditions” ([3]). By the third quarter of 2024, Cohen & Steers even recorded its first quarter of positive net inflows since Q1 2022, with about $1.3 billion of net new money driven by U.S. REIT strategies ([3]) ([3]). This was a welcome inflection, as the prior period saw persistent outflows amid rising interest rates and real-asset price declines ([3]). As of mid-2025, the firm’s total AUM stands near $89 billion ([4]) – up from about $80.7 billion a year earlier ([5]) thanks to market appreciation – but flows remain choppy month-to-month (e.g. June 2025 saw $184M net outflows, followed by $209M inflows in July) ([4]) ([6]). In short, Cohen & Steers is navigating a volatile landscape, balancing shareholder payouts and growth initiatives against the backdrop of macro factors that can shift investor sentiment suddenly – as dramatically as any “game-changing” news in other sectors.
Dividend Policy and History
Dividends are a cornerstone of CNS’s shareholder return profile. The company pays a quarterly cash dividend, and it has maintained uninterrupted dividends for 21 consecutive years since its IPO ([3]). The dividend has been growing at a modest pace: in early 2024, the Board raised the quarterly payout from $0.57 to $0.59 per share (a 3.5% increase) ([7]). Again in the first quarter of 2025, Cohen & Steers announced a 5.1% increase, bumping the quarterly dividend from $0.59 to $0.62 per share ([8]). This lifted the annualized payout to $2.48. At the current share price (mid-$70s), the stock yields roughly 3.3%–3.4% ([9]) – a significantly higher yield than it had at its late-2024 peak (when the yield was about 2.2% amid a much higher stock price) ([3]).
Cohen & Steers’ dividend policy reflects a high payout of earnings. Over the trailing twelve months, the payout ratio has been around 79–80% of net income ([9]). Such a high payout means the dividend is largely covered by current earnings, with a limited buffer. Management’s willingness to consistently raise the dividend despite volatile markets signals confidence in the stability of the firm’s fee revenues and cash flows. That said, the near-80% payout also indicates that only about 20% of earnings are retained, which modestly constrains internal capital generation. In the absence of significant earnings growth, dividend hikes have been in the low single digits (a few cents per share), keeping the yield attractive without overstretching coverage. The dividend is paid from operating earnings (GAAP EPS of $3.15 over the past year) and free cash flow, as Cohen & Steers has minimal capital expenditure needs. Notably, as an asset manager (not a REIT), the firm does not report funds-from-operations (FFO/AFFO); hence, payout is best evaluated against net income. Cash flow generation has been strong given the firm’s high margins, supporting the regular distributions. Overall, Cohen & Steers offers an appealing yield underpinned by steady (if cyclical) fee income, but investors should monitor earnings trends closely – a downturn in AUM or fees would quickly tighten the cushion on its generous dividend.
Leverage and Debt Maturities
Balance sheet leverage at Cohen & Steers is very low. The company carries virtually no long-term debt – its annual reports show $0 in long-term debt in recent years ([10]). This conservative capital structure means CNS has not needed to tap substantial debt financing to fund operations or growth. Instead, the business grows organically and distributes excess cash to shareholders (via dividends and, historically, occasional buybacks). The firm’s Debt-to-Equity ratio is only ~0.27 ([9]), which likely reflects small short-term liabilities or lease obligations rather than interest-bearing debt. With no bonds or significant loans outstanding, Cohen & Steers has no looming debt maturities to refinance – an important point in a rising-rate environment.
The liquidity position is robust. As of year-end and recent quarters, the company holds a substantial amount of cash and seed investments on its balance sheet. For example, management noted liquidity of about $348 million at Q3 2024’s end ([3]), and by March 31, 2024, cash and liquid treasuries were $233 million (down from $319 million at the prior year-end after paying out annual bonuses) ([11]). Key liquidity ratios underscore this strength: the current ratio is roughly 4.8 ([9]), indicating that current assets are nearly five times current liabilities. In short, CNS is not reliant on borrowed money – a strategic advantage that gives it financial flexibility. The lack of debt means interest coverage is a non-issue (interest expense is negligible), and it insulates the firm from interest rate risk on the financing side. This conservative stance is typical of many asset managers, which often operate asset-light and avoid leverage at the corporate level. For investors, Cohen & Steers’ clean balance sheet is a positive: it reduces financial risk and ensures that virtually all operating profit is available for equity holders (after paying operating expenses and taxes). It also provides the capacity, if needed, to weather downturns or make opportunistic acquisitions without worrying about debt covenants or high interest costs.
Earnings and Coverage Metrics
Cohen & Steers’ earnings profile reflects the fee-driven nature of its business, which is sensitive to market conditions. After a tough 2022–2023 (when equity and real asset markets declined sharply), the company’s financial performance has improved alongside asset valuations. In the third quarter of 2024, CNS reported earnings per share of $0.77, up from $0.68 in the prior quarter ([3]). Revenue for Q3 2024 was $133 million (versus $122 million in Q2), aided by higher average AUM ([3]). Operating margins remain strong – around 35-36% on an adjusted basis in recent quarters ([3]) – thanks to the firm’s high-fee niche and disciplined cost management. For full-year 2024, analysts expected EPS in the ~$2.70–2.80 range, but actual results came in slightly below some forecasts. Notably, Q3 2024’s $0.77 EPS missed the consensus estimate of $0.80, and revenue of $139.8M also undershot the ~$142M forecast ([12]). While not a large miss, it was a departure from the company’s prior trend of meeting or beating expectations, highlighting the inherent volatility in its revenue (driven by markets).
Dividend coverage can be assessed by the payout ratio and earnings trajectory. As discussed, the current dividend implies an annual payout of ~$2.48 per share, which was about 79% of trailing 12-month earnings ([9]). In other words, Cohen & Steers earned roughly $3.15 per share over the past year ([9]) and paid $2.45 of that in dividends ([9]). This 1.25× coverage (earnings/dividend) is adequate but not overly ample. It means the dividend is covered by existing profits with only ~20% of earnings left as a buffer or for reinvestment. By comparison, many traditional asset managers have lower payout ratios (50–70%), whereas REITs (which CNS invests in, but is not itself) often payout ~80-90% of cash flows. Thus, CNS’s coverage is in line with an income-focused capital return model. The firm’s free cash flow aligns closely with net income (since capex needs are minor), so EPS is a reasonable proxy for its ability to fund the dividend. So far, coverage has held steady: even during the 2022 market downturn, Cohen & Steers remained profitable and sustained the dividend. If a severe market correction caused management fee revenues to drop, earnings could dip below the dividend requirement – a scenario to watch for. The current margin of safety, while not large, is bolstered by the company’s cash reserves and zero interest burden, which could help bridge short-term shortfalls if needed.
It’s also worth noting that management fees typically react with leverage to markets – a 10% drop in AUM can translate to a slightly larger drop in earnings due to fixed costs. Conversely, rising markets can boost EPS significantly. This operating leverage means dividend coverage could improve quickly in bull markets or tighten in bear markets. For now, covering the dividend is not an issue, but the high payout policy does rely on Cohen & Steers’ continued profitability. The firm’s own commentary indicates confidence: leadership cites the dividend as an important part of shareholder value, and the continued hikes suggest they anticipate earnings will at least keep pace. In summary, interest coverage is essentially infinite (with no debt), and dividend coverage is solid at current profit levels – though income-focused investors should keep an eye on fee trends that feed those earnings.
Valuation and Comparative Metrics
At the current market price, CNS shares trade at a valuation premium relative to many peers in the asset management industry. As of September 2025, Cohen & Steers’ trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is about 24 ([2]), and the forward P/E is ~21–22 based on next year’s earnings estimates ([9]). This multiple is higher than the broader market’s (the S&P 500’s forward P/E is roughly 18–19) and significantly higher than traditional asset managers of similar size. For example, AllianceBernstein (AB) and Artisan Partners (APAM) – firms with market capitalizations in the $3–6 billion range – trade around 11×–13× earnings ([2]). Even large diversified managers like T. Rowe Price or Carlyle Group often command mid-teens P/Es in the current environment. By contrast, Cohen & Steers’ valuation is closer to that of alternative asset managers or niche firms: its P/E (~24) parallels the likes of Blue Owl Capital (~24×) and is well above pure-play active managers in equities or bonds ([10]). The market appears to be assigning a premium for Cohen & Steers’ specialized focus on real assets and strong margins, as well as its reliable dividend.
Other metrics tell a similar story. The stock’s dividend yield is ~3.3% ([9]), which is higher than the S&P 500 average (~1.5%) and many financial stocks, but in line with or slightly below some peer income-focused managers. For instance, AllianceBernstein’s yield is often around 7–8% (with a variable payout policy), and APAM’s near 6–7% in recent periods – reflecting their lower valuations. Cohen & Steers’ yield, being more moderate, underscores its higher stock price relative to fundamentals. On a price-to-book basis, CNS also looks expensive: it recently had a P/B around 11.5 ([3]), though book value is less meaningful for asset-light managers (whose value lies in fee streams, not tangible assets). A more pertinent metric, perhaps, is enterprise value to EBITDA – Finviz estimates CNS’s EV/EBITDA at about 17.2 ([9]), again on the upper end for the industry.
It’s important to consider that CNS’s stock price has been volatile, swinging between $68.99 and $110.67 in the past 52 weeks ([13]). This wide range – the stock was near $110 in late 2024 and fell into the $70s by mid-2025 – suggests the market’s view of its value can shift rapidly with interest rate expectations and real-asset performance. At the high end of that range, the valuation briefly exceeded 40× earnings (when enthusiasm about a market rebound and fund performance ran high) ([3]). The subsequent pullback brought the multiple back to the low-20s, which is more reasonable but still pricing in solid growth and continued inflows. Investors are effectively paying a premium for Cohen & Steers’ strong franchise in REIT/infrastructure investing and its high profitability (operating margins ~35%).
Is this premium justified? Bulls would argue that CNS deserves a higher multiple because of its specialization and secular tailwinds (e.g. the need for income in a low-yield world, and the institutional interest in real assets for diversification). Additionally, Cohen & Steers has a high insider ownership (around 46% held by insiders) ([9]), which often correlates with disciplined management and alignment with shareholders – possibly meriting a quality premium. Bears, however, might point out that CNS’s earnings are cyclical and heavily tied to one sector (real estate), and that it faces competitive pressures from lower-cost passive products. In their view, paying over 20× earnings for a relatively mature asset manager with episodic growth could be risky, especially if industry headwinds or an economic downturn hits fee revenues.
In summary, Cohen & Steers stock is not “cheap” by traditional measures, but its valuation reflects the company’s robust profitability, dividend consistency, and unique positioning. The 3.4% yield provides some valuation support (investors get paid to wait), and the lack of debt reduces downside risk. Still, further upside in the share price may depend on the firm delivering higher AUM growth or expanding its fee streams (for example, via new products) to grow into the premium multiple.
Key Risks and Challenges
Despite its strengths, Cohen & Steers faces several risks and potential red flags that investors should consider:
– Market and Asset-Class Risk: As a specialist in real assets, CNS is particularly exposed to real estate and infrastructure market cycles. Rising interest rates tend to hurt real estate valuations and fund flows – a dynamic the company felt in 2022–2023 when asset depreciation led to declining AUM ([3]). A prolonged high-rate environment or recession could again pressure REIT prices, reduce the value of Cohen & Steers’ portfolios, and in turn cut its fee income. The sharp stock volatility (52-week swing from ~$69 to $111 ([13])) reflects this sensitivity to macro conditions. If inflation or credit stresses hit real assets, CNS’s earnings and stock could underperform broader markets. On the flip side, market rallies in its focus areas drive strong results – the risk is the firm’s fortunes are largely tied to one corner of the market, with less diversification than larger asset managers.
– Client Flows and Fee Pressure: Net outflows have been a concern until recently. Between Q2 2022 and mid-2024, Cohen & Steers experienced persistent investor redemptions, as evidenced by the fact that Q3 2024 was the first quarter with net positive inflows in over two years ([3]) ([3]). Even with 2024’s improvement, flows remain inconsistent – the firm projected roughly $1 billion of known redemptions to occur between Q4 2023 and Q1 2025 (likely from a large institutional mandate) ([3]). Outflows can be self-reinforcing: if performance falters or competitors lure clients away, Cohen & Steers could see assets shrink further, reducing revenue. Moreover, the rise of passive investing and low-cost ETFs poses a challenge. Many investors have shifted from actively managed mutual funds (CNS’s core offerings) to index funds or ETFs for real estate exposure. This trend exerts fee pressure on the industry. Cohen & Steers has acknowledged this shift – noting an “increasing investor preference for ETFs, particularly in real estate and preferreds” ([3]) – and is responding by launching its own active ETFs in those categories ([3]) ([12]). However, success is not guaranteed; these new ETFs must compete with giants like Vanguard and BlackRock on cost and with other active managers on performance. Management fee rates at Cohen & Steers are relatively high (effective fee rate ~0.58% in late 2024) ([3]), which is good for revenue but could spur client pushback or switching to cheaper alternatives if performance doesn’t justify the cost. In short, the threat of outflows and fee compression is a key risk, and the company’s future growth depends on its ability to attract and retain assets in a competitive landscape.
– High Payout and Earnings Dependence: The company’s dividend payout (~80% of earnings) ([9]) is a double-edged sword. While it signals confidence and rewards shareholders, it also leaves little margin for error if profits dip. Any sustained downturn in AUM or unexpected expense surge could put the dividend at risk of stagnation or cut. Unlike some financial firms, Cohen & Steers doesn’t have leveraged balance sheet risks, but its dividend commitment means that earnings volatility directly affects shareholder returns. For now, earnings comfortably cover the dividend, but investors should be mindful that a few weak quarters could tighten coverage quickly. The high payout also means the firm retains less capital for reinvestment – potentially limiting flexibility unless they tap equity or use cash on hand for growth initiatives. This isn’t an imminent danger given the cash reserves, but it’s a structural consideration.
– Expense Growth and Margin Pressure: To maintain its competitive edge, Cohen & Steers has been investing in technology, distribution, and infrastructure, which is driving costs higher. Management guided to a 6–7% increase in general & administrative (G&A) expenses for 2024 ([3]), as they upgrade systems and support new product offerings. Additionally, as the firm builds out an ETF platform and a non-traded REIT product, there will be upfront costs. While the company’s operating margin is still healthy (mid-30s%), rising expenses without a corresponding rise in revenue will crimp margins. Already, Q3 2024 saw total expenses increase from the prior quarter due to higher compensation (kept at ~40% of revenue) and distribution costs ([3]). Maintaining margin expansion “is dependent on asset appreciation and growth of fee-paying assets,” CEO Joe Harvey noted ([3]), underscoring that cost discipline alone won’t improve profitability – they need revenue tailwinds. If markets stagnate and costs keep climbing, earnings growth could stall. This risk is partly within management’s control (they could slow hiring or tech spend if needed), but it’s something to monitor as the company scales new business lines.
– Concentration and Key Person Risk: Cohen & Steers’ focus on real assets means concentration risk – the firm is not broadly diversified across all asset classes. While this specialization is its selling point, it also means geographic and sector concentration (e.g. a large portion of AUM is in U.S. real estate equities). Any regulatory changes or secular challenges in the real estate investment landscape (for instance, tax law changes for REITs or a structural decline in demand for office properties) could disproportionately impact CNS’s business. Additionally, insiders own ~46% of the company ([9]) (notably co-founders Martin Cohen and Robert Steers, who have been the figureheads of the firm). Such high insider ownership can be positive for alignment, but it also means the public float is limited (~27 million shares) ([9]), which can exacerbate stock volatility and liquidity risk. If an insider were to liquidate a substantial position, it could weigh on the stock. Moreover, any future transition of leadership (the current CEO, Joseph Harvey, took over in 2022 from co-founder Rob Steers) will be important – the founders’ continued involvement has lent stability and prestige, and their eventual full retirement could test whether the firm can retain its investment culture and client relationships. There’s no indication of any issue here, but for a firm of this size, key personnel and firm reputation are critical assets; loss of star portfolio managers or investment talent would be a risk to watch.
In sum, Cohen & Steers’ main vulnerabilities lie in external factors (markets and investor behavior) and the firm’s ability to adapt. It has a strong franchise, but not an immune one. The challenges in the previous year – asset depreciation, outflows ([3]) ([3]) – show that even a respected specialist can hit bumps when its sector is out of favor. The company is proactively addressing some risks (expanding product lineup, realigning distribution to target RIAs, etc. ([3]) ([3])), yet execution will be key.
Outlook and Open Questions
Looking ahead, investors in CNS will be focused on a few open questions about its trajectory:
– Can positive net flows be sustained? The return to net inflows in late 2024 was an encouraging sign, but it coincided with strong market performance. The firm itself expects some large planned redemptions (~$1B) to hit in the near term ([3]). An open question is whether new sales and fund performance can offset these outflows on a consistent basis. Will the tentative inflows in 2024–25 turn into a steady trend or prove fleeting? Achieving even low-single-digit organic growth in AUM would greatly enhance earnings momentum, whereas a slide back into net outflows would raise concerns about the growth story (and put the premium valuation at risk). This ties closely to market conditions – if real assets remain attractive, Cohen & Steers could benefit from investors allocating more to REITs and infrastructure; if not, gathering assets could be challenging.
– How effective will new product initiatives be? Cohen & Steers is launching actively managed ETFs (in U.S. REITs and global preferred securities) in 2025 ([12]), and it recently launched a non-traded real estate fund ([3]). These efforts aim to capture flows that are bypassing traditional mutual funds. A key question is: Will these new vehicles attract meaningful assets, or simply cannibalize existing funds? Success in ETFs could open a fresh growth channel (and appeal to a younger or more fee-sensitive client base), but competition is fierce. Likewise, the non-traded REIT product (which had an 8.3% return in its first three quarters) ([3]) ([3]) targets the high-net-worth channel where Blackstone’s BREIT dominates – can CNS carve out a niche there? The outcome will determine if Cohen & Steers can diversify its revenue streams and capture incremental inflows in new wrappers.
– Will margin expansion resume or stall? Management has indicated that compensation ratios will remain stable (~40% of revenue) and G&A will rise mid-single-digits annually ([3]) ([3]). That suggests that significant margin expansion would likely come from revenue growth (higher AUM) rather than cost-cutting. If markets cooperate and AUM rises (or if higher-fee private strategies become a bigger mix), operating margin could expand beyond the current ~35%. However, if AUM stagnates or declines while expenses march upward, margins could erode. An open question is whether Cohen & Steers can maintain its high profitability as it scales – especially given the ongoing investments in tech and distribution. The company has historically been very disciplined on costs, but new ventures may compress margins in the short run. This will be something to monitor in upcoming earnings: is the incremental revenue from growth initiatives outpacing the incremental costs? So far, the firm expects only a modest uptick in 2024 expenses and is confident in stable comp ratios, but macro swings could upset these projections.
– How will macro conditions and rates evolve? Perhaps the biggest wild card is the macro environment. Real estate and infrastructure investments are highly sensitive to interest rates and economic growth. A major open question: Are we on the cusp of a rate-cut cycle, or will rates stay “higher for longer”? Many listed REITs have been weighed down by elevated yields and fears of property market weakness. If inflation subsides and central banks begin easing, real assets could see a renaissance – property values might recover, dividend yields on REITs become more attractive relative to bonds, and investor capital could flow back into the sector. This would directly lift Cohen & Steers’ AUM (both via market appreciation and renewed inflows). Conversely, if inflation remains sticky and rates climb further, or if the economy enters a downturn, real estate could face another leg down (especially commercial real estate in challenged sectors like office). That would pose a headwind for CNS. The company cannot control this, but it’s an overarching factor that will influence its results. Management has emphasized the long-term opportunity in its asset classes – citing attractive valuations and under-ownership after the recent tough years ([3]) – but timing is uncertain. Investors are effectively betting that the value in real assets will be recognized and capital will return to these strategies in a substantial way.
– Can Cohen & Steers innovate without diluting its brand? Another question touches on the firm’s identity: It’s known as a premier active manager in real assets. As it ventures into new formats (ETFs, private funds) and possibly new geographies or sub-sectors, can it extend its brand successfully? Will it enter adjacent areas (for example, infrastructure debt or real asset credit products) to broaden its offerings? And if so, can it do that while maintaining performance and focus? The track record so far is solid, but the asset management industry is littered with examples of firms stretching into new areas only to struggle. CNS’s relatively small size could either be an advantage (nimble, focused) or a disadvantage (fewer resources than mega-managers) in this endeavor. There’s no clear answer yet – it’s an open narrative that will unfold in coming years.
Finally, given the high insider ownership and seasoned leadership, governance and alignment seem strong, but one open question is succession and talent retention. The firm’s co-founders are industry pioneers; their eventual full exit might be a psychological milestone. The new generation of leaders (CEO Harvey, CIO Cheigh, etc.) will need to sustain the culture and performance. Thus far, transitions have been smooth, and insider ownership suggests incentives are aligned for long-term performance. Shareholders will nonetheless watch for any changes in strategic direction or capital policy as leadership evolves.
Conclusion: Cohen & Steers stands at an interesting juncture. It’s a company with a clear strength in a specialized domain, now trying to adapt to a changing investment landscape. The stock’s valuation implies confidence that better days are ahead for real assets, yet the firm must prove it can capture the opportunity. In a market where surprise developments – whether a Fed policy shift or a biotech firm’s game-changing presentation – can quickly alter investor sentiment, Cohen & Steers will need to stay agile. It has the balance sheet resilience (no debt, cash on hand) to weather storms and the brand to attract asset flows when sentiment improves. The coming quarters should shed light on whether the recent positive signs (improving flows, strong fund performance) are the start of a lasting upswing or simply a brief uptick in a still-challenging cycle. Investors in CNS will be looking for execution on growth initiatives and prudent steering through whatever market twists lie ahead. The pieces are in place for a recovery – now it’s about delivering and differentiating, even as markets remain prone to sudden shifts. As always, balancing risk and reward in this stock requires keeping one eye on the company’s fundamentals and another on the broader market currents that buffet its asset base. Cohen & Steers has navigated many cycles before; how it manages this one could indeed be a game-changer for its shareholders.
Sources: Official company filings and press releases (Cohen & Steers Investor Relations), SEC filings, and reputable financial media were used to substantiate this analysis. Key references include Cohen & Steers’ dividend declaration announcements ([8]) ([7]), SEC filings/press releases on earnings (showing AUM, flows, and financial performance) ([3]) ([4]), and third-party analyses/transcripts highlighting investor insights ([12]) ([3]). These sources provide a factual basis for the discussion of CNS’s dividend track record, leverage, valuation metrics, and the risks and opportunities facing the company. All data and direct quotations are cited inline to their original sources for verification.
Sources
- https://cohenandsteers.com/news/cohen-steers-inc-declares-quarterly-dividend-24/
- https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/CNS/cohen-steers-inc/pe-ratio
- https://investing.com/news/stock-market-news/earnings-call-cohen–steers-reports-q3-earnings-growth-positive-inflows-93CH-3670652
- https://cohenandsteers.com/news/cohen-steers-announces-preliminary-assets-under-management-and-net-flows-for-june-2025/
- https://cohenandsteers.com/news/cohen-steers-announces-preliminary-assets-under-management-and-net-flows-for-june-2024/
- https://cohenandsteers.com/news/cohen-steers-announces-preliminary-assets-under-management-and-net-flows-for-july-2025/
- https://cohenandsteers.com/news/cohen-steers-inc-declares-quarterly-dividend-20/
- https://cohenandsteers.com/news/cohen-steers-inc-declares-quarterly-dividend-23/
- https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=CNS&%3Bty=oc
- https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/CNS/cohen-steers-inc/long-term-debt
- https://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1284812/000128481224000186/cns-earningsreleasex33124e.htm
- https://za.investing.com/news/company-news/cohen–steers-hikes-quarterly-dividend-to-062-per-share-93CH-3565612
- https://tickergate.com/stocks/cns
For informational purposes only; not investment advice.